Get in touch
SOUTH JERSEY
PHILADELPHIA
FLORIDA

Free Consultation for Personal Injury and Civil Rights Matters 

Michigan’s Legal Defense Fund Act

Samuel D. Jackson • June 28, 2023
  • What is Michigan’s Legal Defense Fund Act (“LDFA”)?

The LDFA is a Michigan law that requires elected officials in the State of Michigan to make certain disclosures if they solicit funds from the public to pay for their legal defense in a matter relating to how they carried out their official duties.

  • Where can the full text of the Legal Defense Fund Act (“LDFA”) be found?

https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-Act-288-of-2008.pdf 

  • Who does the LDFA apply to?

The LDFA applies to individuals who hold an elective office in state or local government in Michigan. 

  • MCLS §15.223(b).
  • How are disclosures made?

Statements are filed with the Michigan Secretary of State. 

  • MCLS §15.525(1)
  • What goes into the disclosure statements?

There are a few types of disclosure statements that need to be filed. When the fund is formed, a statement of organization is filed. Transaction reports are filed on a quarterly basis. When the fund is closed, a statement of dissolution is filed. 

The statement of organization includes the following information:

(a) The name, street address, and telephone number of the legal defense fund. The name of the legal defense fund shall include the first and last names of the elected official who is the beneficiary of the legal defense fund and the words "legal defense fund". 

(b) The name, street address, and telephone number of the individual designated as the treasurer of the legal defense fund. 

(c) The name and address of the financial institution in which money of the legal defense fund is or is intended to be deposited. 

(d) The full name of and office held by the elected official who is the beneficiary of the legal defense fund. 

(e) A description of the criminal, civil, or administrative action arising directly out of the conduct of the elected official's duties for which a contribution to or expenditure from the legal defense fund was made.

  • MCLS §15.525(2)(a)-(e).

Transaction reports include the following information:

(a) The legal defense fund's name, address, and telephone number and the full name, residential and business addresses, and telephone numbers of the legal defense fund's treasurer. 

(b) The following information about each person from whom a contribution is received during the covered period: 

(i) The person's full name. 

(ii) The person's street address. 

(iii) The amount contributed. 

(iv) The date on which each contribution was received. 

(v) The cumulative amount contributed by that person. 

(vi) If the person is an individual whose cumulative contributions are more than $100.00, the person's occupation, employer, and principal place of business. 

(c) The following information itemized as to each expenditure from the legal defense fund that exceeds $50.00 and as to expenditures made to 1 person that cumulatively total $50.00 or more during a covered period: 

(i) The amount of the expenditure. 

(ii) The name and address of the person to whom the expenditure is made. 

(iii) The purpose of the expenditure. 

(iv) The date of the expenditure.

  • MCLS §15.527(1)(a)-(c).

Transaction reports must also include a verification statement signed by the treasurer, similar to the following example: 

I, ____________, am the treasurer of the [elected official’s full name] Legal Defense Fund. I have used all reasonable diligence in preparing this report, and to the best of my knowledge, it is true and complete.

  • When are disclosures made?

The statement of organization is filed within 10 days after the legal defense fund receives its first contribution, OR the fund first spends money behalf of the elected official, whichever is earlier.

  • MCLS §15.525(1).

The statement of dissolution must be filed when the fund is dissolved.

  • MCLS §15.525(5).

Transaction reports are filed on a quarterly basis, according to the schedule below:

Transaction reports for following period:

Must be filed by:

January 1 to March 31

April 25

April 1 to June 30

July 25

July 1 to September 30

October 25

October 1 to December 31

January 25


  • MCLS §15.527(2).

  • What are the penalties for failing to make a required disclosure?

For failing to file a timely statement of organization:

There is a $10 per day late fee, with a maximum of $300. 

An elected official who fails to file at all can be found guilty of a misdemeanor and punished by imprisonment for up to 93 days or a fine of up to $1,000, or both.

  • MCLS §15.525(4).

For failing to file a timely transaction report:

There is a $25 per day late fee, with a maximum of $500, unless the fund has received a contribution of over $10,000 in the last 2 years, in which case there is a schedule of higher fines as set forth at length in the LDFA, with a maximum of $1,000.

A treasurer who fails to file 2 transaction reports, where both reports remain unfiled for over 30 days can be found guilty of a misdemeanor and punished by imprisonment for up to 93 days or a fine of up to $1,000, or both.

  • MCLS §15.529(1).
  • What should an elected official do if he failed to make a required disclosure?

Immediately file a disclosure statement with the Secretary of State

  • What is the likely outcome if an elected official makes a late disclosure?

For a late statement of organization:

If no charges have been filed, the most likely outcome is that the official will pay a late fee. If the disclosure statement is filed more than a month late, the fee will not exceed $300. Criminal charges are unlikely if the official files the disclosure statement prior to being criminally charged. 

This prediction is based on the wording of the statute, which merely imposes a late fee if an official fails to file “as required by this section” (the overall section describing how to file the disclosure statement), but imposes a criminal penalty for an official who fails to file the disclosure statement “under this subsection” (the specific subsection addressing late and missing filings). In other words, if an official fails to file the disclosure statement, then a late fee is imposed at the time that the late statement is filed. But if an official also fails to file the statement late, then a criminal penalty can be imposed. If both situations were treated the same way, then there would be no reason to cap the late fee at $300, since the criminal fine can be as high as $1,000.


  • MCLS §15.525(4).

For a late transaction report:

If there is only one overdue transaction report, then a fine is likely to be the only punishment. If there are two overdue transaction reports, but the second report is less than 30 days overdue, then a fine is still likely to be the only punishment. If there are two or more overdue transaction reports, and at least two of them are more than 30 days overdue, then criminal charges may be filed.

  • MCLS §15.529(1)-(2).

  • What else should an elected official seeking donations for legal defense be aware of?
  • An elected official may not solicit or accept any contributions to pay for a legal defense in an action relating to their official duties unless the contributions are made to a fund that complies with the LDFA.* MCLS §15.533(1).
  • Anonymous contributions to legal defense funds are not allowed. Any anonymous donations must be given to a 501(c)(3) charity and documented with a receipt, and may not be deposited into the legal fund account.* MCLS §15.533(2).
  • Straw donations (where Party A gives money to Party B for Party B to contribute to the legal defense fund) are not permitted.* MCLS §15.533(3).
  • All the money legal defense fund must be kept in a single account, separate from any other money.* MCLS §15.533(4).
  • All records for the fund must be kept for 5 years. Failure to do so can result in a civil fine of up to $1,000. MCLS §15.527(6).
  • Knowingly submitting false information in one of the disclosure forms is a misdemeanor punishable by up to 180 days in jail or a fine of up to $5,000, or both. MCLS §15.527(7).
  • Filing an incomplete transaction report can result in a civil fine of up to $1,000. MCLS §15.529(3).
  • Money from the legal defense fund may only be used to pay for administration of the fund, attorney fees, or related legal costs.* MCLS §15.5235(1).
  • The fund cannot be used to pay for direct or indirect payments for media purchases, media consulting, or mass mailings.* MCLS §15.5235(1).
  • The fund can only be used to pay for the legal defense of the one elected official who established it.* MCLS §15.5235(1).


* Violation of any of the rules marked with the * is a misdemeanor punishable by up to 93 days in jail or a fine of up to $1,000, or both, or a fine of $10,000 if violated by a corporation or some other entity besides an individual. MCLS §15.533(5), MCLS §15.5235(2).

More News & Resources

December 5, 2024
By Terrell A. Ratliff, Esquire • 3 rd December, 2024
December 5, 2024
The Lento Law Group defends people accused of or charged with child abuse in Pennsylvania.
November 28, 2024
A 30-year-old woman in Oklahoma received a victim protection order (VPO) against her father after he beat her.
November 28, 2024
Bam Margera heads to rehab after a DUI arrest in Pennsylvania. Learn about DUI defense in Pennsylvania.
November 15, 2024
The House of Representatives has advanced an anti-hazing bill for Senate consideration that would increase hazing prevention.
By By Joseph Cannizzo, Esquire • 1 August, 2024 August 16, 2024
Surely no one would doubt that children are curious creatures, and as such, they often end up in places they don’t belong if they are not well looked after. The curiosity of a child’s mind knows no bounds, and while, as parents, we have come to expect simple “boo-boos” like a scrapped knee for example, sometimes curiosity can lead children into far more precarious situations. Obviously then, there are many situations where, from the worldview of an adult, while we see dangers that should best be avoided, a child may only see adventure – a new mystery waiting to be explored. While, of course, it is important that parents foster their children’s inquisitive minds, a parent’s first priority should surely always be to protect their children from serious bodily injury, or worse. Now that Summer is just around the corner, protecting our children is particularly important as swimming pools will start to be opened up and trampolines will be going back out in the yard. Fortunately, the law recognizes the tendency of children to view all the world as a playground, and imposes a special duty on owners of such things as swimming pools and trampolines to protect children from the hazard these things can represent. Like many states, New Jersey has adopted this principle of tort law, called the attractive nuisance doctrine. Put simply, an attractive nuisance is any man-made construct present upon land, which may lure children, and which can cause them bodily injury should they play on, in, or around it. The defining characteristic of an attractive nuisance is just that – that it is attractive to children and that the potential fun the attractive nuisance poses, entices a child like a moth to the flame. Swimming pools, playground equipment, and other artificial landscaping features can make your yard a magnet for every kid in the neighborhood, but the very things that might make your yard so enticing to a child may also be the very things that make it so potentially dangerous for them. As a result of this potential for harm, the law places a heightened duty on property owners who have items that will both attract children and present a unique potential for harm. The theory is that children are too young to appreciate the risk of harm these attractive nuisances pose, and therefore, because these items essentially induce a child into a hazardous area of your property, the property owner is expected to take special precautions to mitigate the risk of harm, for example, by putting a fence around a pool. Elements of Attractive Nuisance If the property owner knows, or reasonably should know, that children are likely to trespass upon his or her property; In response to an artificial condition present upon the land; Which the property owner knows, or reasonably should know poses an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily injury; Such that a child, because of their youth, does not discover the condition or realize the risk involved; and Said property owner fails to take reasonable precautions to safeguard against the risk of injury. Common Attract Nuisances Water Features Studies suggest that an adult can drown from as little as six tablespoons of water. This number is even smaller for a child. Water features on property – including fountains, pools, and wells – can pose an enormous risk of drowning to children who may want to splash around inside, particularly if they cannot gauge how deep the water is, and especially if they have not yet learned to swim. A swimming pool is the most common example of an attractive nuisance, and as the summer weather soon comes upon us, pool owners – especially owners of inground pools – should be particularly mindful of the hazard posed by the attractive nuisance. As a pool owner, you could be liable for accidents even if children sneak into your pool without your consent. Whether the pool is in-ground, above ground, or even a kiddie pool, you can reduce your risk by surrounding your pool area with a fence, installing a locking gate (preferably one with an audible alarm), and covering the pool with a safety cover when not in use. New Jersey has passed legislation specifically outlined the heightened obligation of pool owners. Under New Jersey’s swimming pool safety act, called “William’s Law,” any pool must be fenced or walled in with a structure of at least 5 feet high and without any openings wide enough for a 4-inch object to pass through it. If a pool owner fails to properly enclose the water feature and a child is injured as a result, the child’s family may be able to sue under the attractive nuisance doctrine, as well as raise a negligence per se claim in connection with the pool owner’s violation of William’s Law. Trampolines & Playground Equipment Most home playground injuries involve swing sets, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). To reduce the chance of accidents, therefore, the National Association of Home Inspectors recommends spacing swings at least 24 inches apart and at least 30 inches from the support frame. Swing sets – especially wooden ones – should be checked regularly for wear & tear, warping, or rot. Because most injuries from swings also involve falls, installing a shock-absorbing surface for your playground like sand, wood chips, or gravel, for example, can help mitigate the likelihood of injury. Trampolines can also pose a significant safety hazard to young children who may not know how to utilize one safely. If you are planning on purchasing a trampoline, look for a model that has a zippered entrance which can be locked. Additionally, consider installing a locked and alarmed fence around your yard or around the playground to make the feature inaccessible to uninvited users. Home Construction Projects Construction projects and the tools and equipment which may be present on a construction site can be kid magnets. Young children often get toy tool sets to play with, so seeing a real hammer or saw can be enticing. Rebuilding a deck, repaving a driveway, pouring concrete, building additions, and even repairing a roof can all present potentially dangerous conditions which a child may be drawn to. To some children, a ladder must be climbed or a hole must be jumped in. The law doesn’t expect homeowners to complete their construction projects overnight, but when stepping away, it is critical to turn off and put away power tools, remove heavy equipment if possible, and consider putting up hazard signs, safety cones, or even a barrier of caution tape to make the potential danger clearly evident. Our Tip: Be Alert to Hazards At the end of the day, even with due care it is impossible to prevent all eventualities, especially when children are involved, and unfortunately accidents do happen. At the same time, it is also important to be vigilant and to stay aware of hazardous or potentially hazardous conditions on our property which children may be drawn to. This is especially true if you live in a neighborhood with families who have children or near an area where children may be present, such as near a park or a school. Call The Lento Law Group If your child was the victim of an attractive nuisance or was otherwise injured on another person’s property, call the Lento Law Group today for a free phone consultation. Our caring, compassionate, and knowable staff will be happy to go over the facts of your potential case so that our experienced personal injury attorneys can see if you have a viable cause of action. There is absolutely no cost to you unless we secure a financial recovery on your behalf. Call today!
August 1, 2024
Alabama teacher and student rights bills highlight school tensions over student discipline. Let us help enforce your rights.
June 13, 2024
The mistakes of an assistant in a medical practice can threaten the medical professional’s license. Get skilled attorney defense.
June 13, 2024
By Larry Katz, Esquire • 12 June, 2024
By Joseph D. Lento May 21, 2024
TIf you are a medical professional providing reproductive care and counseling, you are likely well aware of the risks you face from new laws limiting access to abortions and related information and services. Your license and employment may be at risk. Let the Lento Law Group’s premier license defense attorneys help you invoke your legal rights to practice your medical profession in good conscience. New Bill Seeks to Protect Medical Providers The Connecticut legislature is considering a bill that would protect medical providers who share information about access to reproductive care. A media report on the new bill highlights how the bill responds to new threats against reproductive care providers who share information on abortion services. State legislatures across the country have restricted access to abortion services. Employers and licensing boards may construe those restrictions to prevent medical providers from sharing information about lawful reproductive care provided in other states, placing those medical professionals’ licenses and employment at risk. The Bill’s Particulars The new Connecticut bill, if enacted into law, would guarantee those medical providers the right to exercise their conscience, when sharing information about lawful abortion services in other states. Employers, including religious hospitals not providing abortion counseling or services, would be unable to retaliate against the medical providers sharing that information. The bill would also prohibit the state’s medical licensing authorities from taking into account licensing action in other states against those providers who follow their consciences. Reciprocal Conscience Rights Courts and legislatures have long worked to protect the conscience rights of medical providers who refuse on religious and related grounds to provide abortion counseling or services. The new Connecticut bill seeks to turn those so-called negative conscience rights into positive rights to provide abortion information on reciprocal conscience grounds. Medical providers refusing abortion services and counseling, and providers offering abortion services and counseling, have reciprocal rights and conscience interests. The new bill, if enacted into law, would recognize those reciprocal rights and interests. Defending Your Conscience Rights The above bill indicates that you may have certain legal rights and interests that protect you when you face employment or licensing issues over the exercise of your conscience. Our attorneys can assist you through the license investigation process to ensure that you have the best opportunity to retain your professional license free of any discipline. We can also help you navigate your employer’s grievance procedures to ensure that your employer respects your legal rights and interests, and that you preserve your job, career, reputation, and income. Premier License Defense for Reproductive Care Professionals If you are a medical professional providing reproductive care and counseling, our offices across the country offer premier attorneys to handle your professional license defense and employment issues. It is important that you call us as soon as you encounter an employment or licensing problem. Call 833.536.8652 now for the representation you need for your employment and license defense issues relating to reproductive care.
More Posts
Share by: