Get in touch
SOUTH JERSEY
PHILADELPHIA
FLORIDA

Free Consultation for Personal Injury and Civil Rights Matters 

Eric Mays……. A true voice for the people of Flint and victim of First Amendment Rights Violation

Joseph Cannizzo • April 28, 2023

As the ancient Greek political philosopher Plato wrote in his seminal work, the Republic, “One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.” It is a sentiment that is as true today as it was in the days of ancient Greece.


Today, however, in the city of Flint, Michigan, there is a politician who is trying to participate in the political process – trying to be a voice for the people he was elected to represent – but who, unfortunately, is being denied the opportunity to do so by some of those very “inferiors” that Plato wrote about. That brave politician is Flint City Councilman Eric Mays.


Mays was first elected to his seat on the Flint City Council in 2013, winning his election over candidate Anita Brown to represent the City’s 1st Ward. The 1st Ward is located to the far north of Flint, roughly from Clio Road to the west to Saginaw Street to the east, and from Carpenter Road to the north and Person Road to the south. Four years later, Councilman Mays defeated Brown a second time.


In 2021, Councilman Mays was re-elected for a third term.


Despite Councilman Mays’ clear popularity with his Genesee County constituency, Mays is far less popular with many of his fellow City Councilmembers. Councilman Mays has repeatedly faced censorship from his fellow Councilmembers, with the Council even going so far as to refuse Mays reentry into the Council meeting chamber after excusing himself to use the lavatory.


This unjust censorship of Mays came to a head just over a year ago, on April 25, 2022, when he was ordered to leave a City Council meeting by Council President Allie Herkenroder, after she claimed he had left his seat and returned without permission. Mays was subsequently removed from the meeting by police who escorted him from the meeting in handcuffs.


Mays was subsequently charged with a disorderly conduct misdemeanor in connection with the event, however, even the Genesee County 67th Judicial District Court Judge Vikki Bayeh-Haley who sentenced Mays stated during the sentencing that, “He was right. He did have the right to stay in [his] seat. The City Council made the wrong ruling.”


Despite Council President Herkenroder claiming that Councilman Mays left his seat and attempted to return without permission, video from the City Council meeting showed that Mays specifically asked Herkenroder if he could be excused.


“May I ask to be excused? Because you won’t get the pleasure of throwing me out,” Mays asked.


“Yes, you may be excused,” Herkenroder replied.


Given the exchange, Judge Bayeh-Haley remarked at the sentencing that, “Whether [President Herkenroder] intended to lie or was mistaken... [Mays] did have permission to leave and return.”


About the Flint City Council, Judge Bayeh-Haley remarked, “Ideally, I would like to have some type of coach or person come in and work with the entire council to try to teach them how to work together. It would be nice if they could do that on their own.”

But “working together” does not appear to a primary objective for many of the members on the Flint City Council, including members Ladel Lewis, Judy Priestley, Eva Worthing, Dennis Pfeiffer, and Council President Herkenroder, who continue to attempt to censor Councilman Mays.


Last month, in March 2023, Councilman Mays decided to take action. Realizing that the silencing of his voice by his fellow Councilmembers was really the silencing of the hundreds of voices of his constituents, Councilman Mays retained our office, Lento Law Group, P.C., to combat this unjust and unconstitutional abridgement of not only his First Amendment rights, but the ongoing disenfranchisement of those citizens of the 1st Ward whom Mays has been repeatedly elected to represented.


Most recently, Councilman Mays is leading the charge to compensate those in Flint who have suffered property damage and loss as a result of the City’s long-standing sewage backup problem. Mays plans to bring forth a Resolution which will expedite the claims process and ensure sufficient funds are held in reserve to continue to pay damage claims in connection with the ongoing sewage backup issue. 


This is just one of the ways in which Council Mays is fighting for the people of Flint, not just within the 1st Ward, but overall. Even so, his fellow City Councilmembers seem intent on continuing to try to shut Mays down at every turn.


But in retaining Lento Law Group, P.C. – which only last month sent Cease & Desist letters to several of the City Councilmembers who have been repeatedly and flagrantly encroaching on Councilman Mays’ rights – Councilman Mays is making perfectly clear that the battle for the soul of Flint has only just begun, and he has no intention of backing down.

More News & Resources

December 5, 2024
By Terrell A. Ratliff, Esquire • 3 rd December, 2024
December 5, 2024
The Lento Law Group defends people accused of or charged with child abuse in Pennsylvania.
November 28, 2024
A 30-year-old woman in Oklahoma received a victim protection order (VPO) against her father after he beat her.
November 28, 2024
Bam Margera heads to rehab after a DUI arrest in Pennsylvania. Learn about DUI defense in Pennsylvania.
November 15, 2024
The House of Representatives has advanced an anti-hazing bill for Senate consideration that would increase hazing prevention.
By By Joseph Cannizzo, Esquire • 1 August, 2024 August 16, 2024
Surely no one would doubt that children are curious creatures, and as such, they often end up in places they don’t belong if they are not well looked after. The curiosity of a child’s mind knows no bounds, and while, as parents, we have come to expect simple “boo-boos” like a scrapped knee for example, sometimes curiosity can lead children into far more precarious situations. Obviously then, there are many situations where, from the worldview of an adult, while we see dangers that should best be avoided, a child may only see adventure – a new mystery waiting to be explored. While, of course, it is important that parents foster their children’s inquisitive minds, a parent’s first priority should surely always be to protect their children from serious bodily injury, or worse. Now that Summer is just around the corner, protecting our children is particularly important as swimming pools will start to be opened up and trampolines will be going back out in the yard. Fortunately, the law recognizes the tendency of children to view all the world as a playground, and imposes a special duty on owners of such things as swimming pools and trampolines to protect children from the hazard these things can represent. Like many states, New Jersey has adopted this principle of tort law, called the attractive nuisance doctrine. Put simply, an attractive nuisance is any man-made construct present upon land, which may lure children, and which can cause them bodily injury should they play on, in, or around it. The defining characteristic of an attractive nuisance is just that – that it is attractive to children and that the potential fun the attractive nuisance poses, entices a child like a moth to the flame. Swimming pools, playground equipment, and other artificial landscaping features can make your yard a magnet for every kid in the neighborhood, but the very things that might make your yard so enticing to a child may also be the very things that make it so potentially dangerous for them. As a result of this potential for harm, the law places a heightened duty on property owners who have items that will both attract children and present a unique potential for harm. The theory is that children are too young to appreciate the risk of harm these attractive nuisances pose, and therefore, because these items essentially induce a child into a hazardous area of your property, the property owner is expected to take special precautions to mitigate the risk of harm, for example, by putting a fence around a pool. Elements of Attractive Nuisance If the property owner knows, or reasonably should know, that children are likely to trespass upon his or her property; In response to an artificial condition present upon the land; Which the property owner knows, or reasonably should know poses an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily injury; Such that a child, because of their youth, does not discover the condition or realize the risk involved; and Said property owner fails to take reasonable precautions to safeguard against the risk of injury. Common Attract Nuisances Water Features Studies suggest that an adult can drown from as little as six tablespoons of water. This number is even smaller for a child. Water features on property – including fountains, pools, and wells – can pose an enormous risk of drowning to children who may want to splash around inside, particularly if they cannot gauge how deep the water is, and especially if they have not yet learned to swim. A swimming pool is the most common example of an attractive nuisance, and as the summer weather soon comes upon us, pool owners – especially owners of inground pools – should be particularly mindful of the hazard posed by the attractive nuisance. As a pool owner, you could be liable for accidents even if children sneak into your pool without your consent. Whether the pool is in-ground, above ground, or even a kiddie pool, you can reduce your risk by surrounding your pool area with a fence, installing a locking gate (preferably one with an audible alarm), and covering the pool with a safety cover when not in use. New Jersey has passed legislation specifically outlined the heightened obligation of pool owners. Under New Jersey’s swimming pool safety act, called “William’s Law,” any pool must be fenced or walled in with a structure of at least 5 feet high and without any openings wide enough for a 4-inch object to pass through it. If a pool owner fails to properly enclose the water feature and a child is injured as a result, the child’s family may be able to sue under the attractive nuisance doctrine, as well as raise a negligence per se claim in connection with the pool owner’s violation of William’s Law. Trampolines & Playground Equipment Most home playground injuries involve swing sets, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). To reduce the chance of accidents, therefore, the National Association of Home Inspectors recommends spacing swings at least 24 inches apart and at least 30 inches from the support frame. Swing sets – especially wooden ones – should be checked regularly for wear & tear, warping, or rot. Because most injuries from swings also involve falls, installing a shock-absorbing surface for your playground like sand, wood chips, or gravel, for example, can help mitigate the likelihood of injury. Trampolines can also pose a significant safety hazard to young children who may not know how to utilize one safely. If you are planning on purchasing a trampoline, look for a model that has a zippered entrance which can be locked. Additionally, consider installing a locked and alarmed fence around your yard or around the playground to make the feature inaccessible to uninvited users. Home Construction Projects Construction projects and the tools and equipment which may be present on a construction site can be kid magnets. Young children often get toy tool sets to play with, so seeing a real hammer or saw can be enticing. Rebuilding a deck, repaving a driveway, pouring concrete, building additions, and even repairing a roof can all present potentially dangerous conditions which a child may be drawn to. To some children, a ladder must be climbed or a hole must be jumped in. The law doesn’t expect homeowners to complete their construction projects overnight, but when stepping away, it is critical to turn off and put away power tools, remove heavy equipment if possible, and consider putting up hazard signs, safety cones, or even a barrier of caution tape to make the potential danger clearly evident. Our Tip: Be Alert to Hazards At the end of the day, even with due care it is impossible to prevent all eventualities, especially when children are involved, and unfortunately accidents do happen. At the same time, it is also important to be vigilant and to stay aware of hazardous or potentially hazardous conditions on our property which children may be drawn to. This is especially true if you live in a neighborhood with families who have children or near an area where children may be present, such as near a park or a school. Call The Lento Law Group If your child was the victim of an attractive nuisance or was otherwise injured on another person’s property, call the Lento Law Group today for a free phone consultation. Our caring, compassionate, and knowable staff will be happy to go over the facts of your potential case so that our experienced personal injury attorneys can see if you have a viable cause of action. There is absolutely no cost to you unless we secure a financial recovery on your behalf. Call today!
August 1, 2024
Alabama teacher and student rights bills highlight school tensions over student discipline. Let us help enforce your rights.
June 13, 2024
The mistakes of an assistant in a medical practice can threaten the medical professional’s license. Get skilled attorney defense.
June 13, 2024
By Larry Katz, Esquire • 12 June, 2024
By Joseph D. Lento May 21, 2024
TIf you are a medical professional providing reproductive care and counseling, you are likely well aware of the risks you face from new laws limiting access to abortions and related information and services. Your license and employment may be at risk. Let the Lento Law Group’s premier license defense attorneys help you invoke your legal rights to practice your medical profession in good conscience. New Bill Seeks to Protect Medical Providers The Connecticut legislature is considering a bill that would protect medical providers who share information about access to reproductive care. A media report on the new bill highlights how the bill responds to new threats against reproductive care providers who share information on abortion services. State legislatures across the country have restricted access to abortion services. Employers and licensing boards may construe those restrictions to prevent medical providers from sharing information about lawful reproductive care provided in other states, placing those medical professionals’ licenses and employment at risk. The Bill’s Particulars The new Connecticut bill, if enacted into law, would guarantee those medical providers the right to exercise their conscience, when sharing information about lawful abortion services in other states. Employers, including religious hospitals not providing abortion counseling or services, would be unable to retaliate against the medical providers sharing that information. The bill would also prohibit the state’s medical licensing authorities from taking into account licensing action in other states against those providers who follow their consciences. Reciprocal Conscience Rights Courts and legislatures have long worked to protect the conscience rights of medical providers who refuse on religious and related grounds to provide abortion counseling or services. The new Connecticut bill seeks to turn those so-called negative conscience rights into positive rights to provide abortion information on reciprocal conscience grounds. Medical providers refusing abortion services and counseling, and providers offering abortion services and counseling, have reciprocal rights and conscience interests. The new bill, if enacted into law, would recognize those reciprocal rights and interests. Defending Your Conscience Rights The above bill indicates that you may have certain legal rights and interests that protect you when you face employment or licensing issues over the exercise of your conscience. Our attorneys can assist you through the license investigation process to ensure that you have the best opportunity to retain your professional license free of any discipline. We can also help you navigate your employer’s grievance procedures to ensure that your employer respects your legal rights and interests, and that you preserve your job, career, reputation, and income. Premier License Defense for Reproductive Care Professionals If you are a medical professional providing reproductive care and counseling, our offices across the country offer premier attorneys to handle your professional license defense and employment issues. It is important that you call us as soon as you encounter an employment or licensing problem. Call 833.536.8652 now for the representation you need for your employment and license defense issues relating to reproductive care.
More Posts
Share by: